Take your bike on the bus in Gdańsk

Bicycles on buses is possible in Eastern Europe (Poland) too

Bicycles on buses is possible in Eastern Europe (Poland) too

Sometimes discussions about bikes on buses (and trams) can swift to high-level arguments about the priority of public transport vs bikes. If you are cycling, why don’t you cycle all the way, why do you need the bus vs. let’s prioritize cycling all the way, even at the expense of bus travel times etc.

The discussion is certainly not over as you have quite a diversity in bike-on-bus rules: in the (low transit and low cycling rate) US, front cycle racks on buses are ubiquitous; in the cycling heaven Netherlands bikes are usually not allowed on buses and trams; while to give an example in several German states bikes are allowed on most transit vehicles.

A low-floor bus in Gdańsk

A low-floor bus in Gdańsk

I believe, however, that bikes on transit vehicles is simply a pricing and demand management issue, not a strategic decision:

  1. When and where your vehicles are not full, do allow bicycles and possibly for free. (you get extra customers! while also promoting cycling, thanks for that.)
  2. When and where the vehicles are full, it is completely acceptable to deny bicycles. (invest in station bike parking instead, please.)
  3. In the gray zone between, a well chosen price for the bicycle is the solution.

This can also work in Eastern Europe, my friend Jani sent me these pictures from Gdańsk, Poland.

See for example this post from almost exactly two years ago about more transit-bike integration.

Share
Posted in Cycling, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

London recommendations?

A subsurface stock of the London Underground (photo: Daniel Sparing)

A subsurface stock of the London Underground (photo: Daniel Sparing)

I am taking the Eurostar to London via Brussels (as there is no direct train yet) to meet good friends and look around again after 6 years. I was wondering if any of you have some recommendations of what’s great there these days?

 

I know I want to

  • have a look at the Circle line to see how bad it is (the Circle line was reorganized as the “Teapot line” to improve capacity towards Hammersmith and reliability in the Circle — it seems that the latter was not all successful)
  • go to the Woolwich Arsenal extension of the Docklands Light Railway and see the three-car DLR operation, all part of the Olympics preparations
  • check out the new bicycle hire scheme and the infamous bike superhighways
  • do something else than trainspotting, such as the Spitalfields market

Thanks for any other tips.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Streetfilms explains Transit-Oriented Development

The guys at Streetfilms do such a great job that it is really hard not to link to them all the time.

In this new video, they describe a New Jersey area as a successful example of Transit Oriented Development.

There is indeed a demand now even in North America for less car-dependent building patterns, as apparently 88% of our generation (Generation Y) prefers to live in “an urban setting”.

By the way, according to just published “new” data on 2008, two-third of the Dutch population lives within 5 km of a train station — which is still a fairly convenient distance to cover by bike.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Fiddling with highway speed limits: A small step in the wrong direction

Spain reduces highway speed limit to 110 km/h to decrease oil dependency. Meanwhile, the Netherlands starts a pilot to increase speed limit to 130 km/h on some highways. What’s going on?

The Afsluitsdijk where drivers are now allowed to consume a bit more oil (photo: TobyA)

The Afsluitsdijk where drivers are now allowed to consume a bit more oil (photo: TobyA)

Briefly, nothing. A small 10 km/h change over 100 km/h will not make a big difference either to decrease oil consumption in case of Spain, nor on the Dutch highways — especially if the new limit will be coupled with tighter speed camera tolerances, which leaves you with pretty much the same de facto speed limit as today (I would say 135 km/h). But it does send a political message.

To look back a bit, note that highway speed limits range from 100 km/h (Norway) to 140 km/h (Poland) in Europe, as well as the infamous unlimited speeds on (parts of) the German Autobahnnen. This latter one-country exception provides the car industry with the excuse to sell cars all around the world which are carefully designed for breaking the law everywhere except certain German highway segments.

These differences, luckily, force us to stop searching for “best practices” (although an argument in the Netherlands was that “abroad” the limit is already 130 km/h — this fictional country named Abroad always intrigued me) and really think about what could be an optimal speed limit on the highway.

Capacity and consumption/emissions characteristics guide us to an optimal speed of about 80-90 km/h, above which the capacity is reduced and emissions per traveled km increase again. Traffic safety of course monotonously decreases by speed, and in fact the difference is also significant in this speed range: the Dutch Institute for Road Safety Research (SWOV) calculated that at the current speed of 120 km/h, a speed increase of 1 km/h (not 10 km/h) already means a 3,3 % increase in deaths.

On the other hand, the pleasure of speeding is hard to quantify, but travel time isn’t: in case of the Afsluitdijk, where the new speed limit is introduced, a time saving of only 1 minute and 10 seconds is possible over the 30 km length.

In short, although a general maximal road speed limit of 80 km/h does not seem to be politically feasible, any further increase above this range is also scientifically not justifiable — it is nothing else than a cheap way to please some voters. Surprise: there are elections today.

Update: just like most scientists, the “most senior traffic offence official” is also against the speed limit raise.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Ride a cabrio U-Bahn in Berlin

Starting from Valentine’s Day, it is possible to register for this year’s cabrio subway rides organized on some Fridays in Berlin. The underground journey gives you a detailed picture of one of the oldest and most extensive metro systems in Europe.

U-Bahn-Cabrio in Berlin (photo: Gabriele Kantel)

U-Bahn-Cabrio in Berlin (photo: Gabriele Kantel)

The Berlin U-Bahn is the backbone of the urban public transport network in a city with surprisingly low car ownership (compared to other German cities), especially now that the S-Bahn has serious problems.

Continue to the BVG site for more info and registration.

Share
Posted in Rail, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

RailRome

We are heading off to Rome for the 4th International Seminar on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis (“RailRome”), so no long posts coming up this week.

If you are not attending but are nevertheless interested in railway optimization, you can for example have a look at the presentations of RailZurich two years ago.

Italian high speed trains (photo: Ciccio Pizzettaro)

Share
Posted in Rail | Leave a comment

Happy Valentine’s from Delft…

Delft Heart

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A medieval tower on the move in Delft

A funny event took place today in Delft during the construction of the new four-track railway tunnel: the Bagijnetoren, a tower built around 1500, then part of the city wall, had to be temporarily replaced some 15 meters, while also lifted by 25 centimeters. Once the cut-and-cover tunnel is finished under the previous location, the tower will be moved back on the same rails, some time in the summer.

Apologies for the animated gif -- but you get the point (photos: Daniel Sparing)

Apologies for the animated gif — but you get the point (photos: Daniel Sparing)

Quite some people were viewing the moving tower (photo: Daniel Sparing)

Quite some people were viewing the moving tower (photo: Daniel Sparing)

This morning, the tower was already on a concrete slab which was connected to the big blue rails — moving the tower seemed easy and you could even see it happening if you focused on the background. The hardest work must have been installing the concrete slab itself under the tower, step by very little step.

In the pictures, you can also see a huge windmill with some tiny houses attached to them: they will not move the windmill but actually cut the tunnel under it somehow. And the railway viaduct on the pictures will be demolished once the first two underground tracks are in operation.

You can also read my previous post on railway tunnels in general, or on the Malmö tunnel.

The windmill in the background will stay in place while the tunnel is constructed beneath (photo: Daniel Sparing)

The windmill in the background will stay in place while the tunnel is constructed beneath (photo: Daniel Sparing)

We got some explanation too (photo: Daniel Sparing)

This is an overlap of two images of a single tower, the left one already halfway moved. (photo: Daniel Sparing)

This is an overlap of two images of a single tower, the left one already halfway moved. (photos: Daniel Sparing)

The Spoorzone in Delft (which means rail zone — hm, would be a great title for a blog on railways) is a construction project to replace two elevated railway tracks with four underground tracks, while moving the railway station itself underground too.

The scene around the current station and the viaduct mostly resembles a desert at the moment, except for the three listed buildings which will be preserved: the windmill, the tower and the station building itself.

You can also check out how the surroundings looked like before the start of the construction on Google Street View, more info on the moving and the history of the tower in Dutch on the Spoorzone site.

The rail viaduct has to go once the tunnel is finished (photo: Daniel Sparing)

The rail viaduct has to go once the tunnel is finished (photo: Daniel Sparing)

The station building will also be preserved (photo: Daniel Sparing)

The station building will also be preserved (photo: Daniel Sparing)

Share
Posted in Rail | Leave a comment

The tragedy of French dynamic platform assignments

This is a small detail but devil is in the details: I am pretty sure that this nuisance scares thousands of people away from French trains and I wish I was wrong.

Train departure board at Paris Gare d'Austerlitz (photo: Daniel Sparing)

Train departure board at Paris Gare d’Austerlitz (photo: Daniel Sparing)

In France, platforms are announced to passengers in the last minute, which forbids people to board trains already in the station while also making it impossible for the crowd around the departure boards to at least disperse to the different platforms (with hopefully some seats and waiting areas).

Dynamic is a positive word. If something is flexible, dynamic, adaptive, every engineer and researcher feels something warm inside… But I should get to the point.

In the Netherlands and Germany, train platforms are in the timetable. Fixed train platforms mean that commuters can get used to them in a week speeding up their journeys and raising their comfort, a fixed platform for two trains (hey, there are usually two tracks next to one platform) means a cross-platform, two-way connection.

Dynamic track assignment on a Schiphol platform (photo: Jayjay P)

Dynamic track assignment on a Schiphol platform (photo: Jayjay P)

Platforms do change, occasionally, whenever disruptions occur, and then you will be notified at latest on the planned platform.

There is a very good dynamic track allocation system in operation at the railway station beneath Amsterdam Schiphol Airport: Northbound trains use tracks 5-6 (and southbound trains 1-2). But these two tracks mean only one platform. Indeed, as you can see on the picture, the Hague-bound train is already assigned to the left platform, but the Paris high speed train might come on any side of this one platform.

In France, platforms are dynamic, so they are only announced some 20 minutes before departure, as written on the bottom of the board on the photo at the top, which is at Paris Gare d’Austerlitz. Now as you can see from the board, this is a station with 5 departures per hour, with some 21 tracks. You must be kidding…

And what is that message on the bottom right saying that you have to board the train 2 minutes before departure? What is the point of the advertised departure time then?

Look at Paris Gare du Nord as well:

Departure board at Paris Gare du Nord (photo: Daniel Sparing)

Departure board at Paris Gare du Nord (photo: Daniel Sparing)

Ten departures an hour on some 27 tracks. Still, I can see the advantages of dynamic track assignment here, at Gare du Nord, which currently has much heavier traffic than Gare d’Austerlitz, and frequent delays can mean that dynamic platforms mean a relief in capacity.

Gated Eurostar platforms in Gare du Nord, Paris (photo: Daniel Sparing)

Gated Eurostar platforms in Gare du Nord, Paris (photo: Daniel Sparing)

I am still not convinced, though, that all of these platforms are to be calculated in the future: consider, for example, that Eurostar trains running to London have to use one of the only two fenced platforms (see photo) because of paranoid UK security regulations. So my guess is that the Eurostar (to Ebbsfleet, London) already has a platform, but can’t be displayed pour des raisons techniques. Indeed, for example, my recent Paris-Rotterdam Thalys train was already on the platform with open doors (with LCDs displaying Rotterdam-Amsterdam) when the track number on the departure display was still blank.

The result, as you can imagine, is hundreds of passengers anxiously waiting and staring at the (one) departure board, which does not help either comfort or (passenger) capacity.

Passengers waiting for track announcements at Paris Gare du Nord (photo: Daniel Sparing)

Passengers waiting for track announcements at Paris Gare du Nord (photo: Daniel Sparing)

To conclude, dynamic traffic management is awesome, but let me note the following on track assignments:

  • Use fixed platforms whenever capacity is enough (or fixed platforms are necessary anyway because of infrastructure constraints). It is better to change 10-20% of the platforms then to not announce any of them.
  • Okay, use dynamic platforms when you need to and can substantially increase a station capacity — although try to use pairs of tracks belonging to a single platform first (as pioneered at Schiphol).
  • For God’s sake, announce those platforms you know in advance. Such as the Eurostar/Thalys platforms at Gare du Nord.

An exception I can think of, when waiting in a common departure area is much more comfortable for the passenger than on the platforms. Examples coming to mind are Chinese high speed stations with luxury departure areas over the platforms, or the case of Brussel Centraal where platforms are quite narrow so it does make sense to make people wait above.

Finally, something nice: here is said Gare du Nord from the outside. Metro (subway) and RER (commuter rail) connections are underground inside the building, but you can see the facade if you travel by taxi, bus or — like me — Vélib’.

Paris Gare du Nord (photo: Daniel Sparing)

Paris Gare du Nord (photo: Daniel Sparing)

Update: read this comment for some advantages of last-minute platform announcements.

Share
Posted in Rail | 5 Comments

A Dutchman driving a Swiss train (video)

For the weekend, here is a short fun Dutch video from last year about a guy doing his dream job for a day:

"You have a real dream job." "Indeed, that's right."

as seen on rtl.nl .

Share
Posted in Rail | Leave a comment